Awards and rankings drive innovation at agency level, because they make achievements in the area of antitrust enforcement transparent.
The concept of encouraging excellence in both academic and more practical writings on competition is an excellent one, and Concurrences has done a remarkable job in creating a process for doing so. Competition policy, law and enforcement worldwide is greatly enriched by the quality of the research that was evidenced in the papers reviewed for the Awards In highlighting scholarship that is particularly deserving of attention, Concurrences and GW provide a real service to the antitrust community.
They must be received by Jury members via regular mail by 1st Mayclose of business. Articles can be co-authored and eligible authors must be natural persons.
They accompany and consecrate the rising prominence and impact of competition law on the global economy. Our empirical study showed that there is a concern that the activity, which is designed to raise safety concerns, has been used by brand drug companies to delay generic entry.
These awards have surely made antitrust academics and practitioners more alert to the value of writing well, with attention not only to substantive analysis but also to clarity and economy of presentation. In highlighting scholarship that is particularly deserving of attention, Concurrences and GW provide a real service to the antitrust community.
The Editorial Committee has invited competition agencies to submit their best soft law documents. One third of these are located in North America, two thirds abroad. They accompany and consecrate the rising prominence and impact of competition law on the global economy.
To ensure transparency, but also impartiality and expertise in the processing of the Awards, publications are assessed following an international peer-reviewed evaluation process.
Members of the Board and of the Steering Committees are chosen from world-renowned antitrust enforcers, counsels and academics who are committed to judging the Awards fairly. However, the Board reserves the right to award fewer awards than planned if the articles under consideration do not meet the standards of the Awards.
In this particularly challenging and ever changing area, we all have much to learn as we seek to understand and comply with the competition laws of other countries entering the global arena.
This is a valuable exercise that not only rewards the authors, but also is very helpful for practitioners.
The dinner and awards ceremony have become an essential part of the competition community calendar. Thank you to the Antitrust Writing Awards for increasing knowledge and promoting a shared understanding of the best, most forward-thinking and innovative practices within the antitrust community.
Readers of Concurrences Review and its sister publication e-Competitions contribute to the selection process by voting for articles.
This initiative will, I hope, increase the quality and depth of such writing to provide the practical complement to academic articles. Finally, the Board votes for the 20 award-winning articles. The award process bring to light practitioner and academic papers that are "must reads".
The articles are selected by a jury and by readers. And I am grateful to Concurrences and GW for their creation of these awards and all of the work they do every year to run the competition and host a delightful dinner. The Antitrust Writing Awards showcase the very best in antitrust writing over the past year, and participating in this process helps keep me updated on developing enforcement trends in the fast-pace and ever expanding world of antitrust and competition law.
The Antitrust Writing Awards uniquely embrace and celebrate that scope for the benefit of all workers in the field. This not only rewards the authors, but also is very helpful for practitioners, because it highlights the most interesting and influential papers from an increasing flood of publications that is more and more difficult to follow.
Introducing the Most Innovative Soft Laws Category contributes to the exchange of best practices and the increasing convergence between jurisdictions.
Various partners and associates of the Antitrust and Litigation teams have been nominated for the Concurrences Antitrust Writing Awards Jessica Delbaum, David Higbee, Djordje Petkoski, Wayne Dale Collins and Arjun Chandran are nominated for the article on “The FTC’s Challenge of Red.
From Concurrences: “The Antitrust Writing Awards’ goal is to promote antitrust scholarship and competition advocacy by recognizing and awarding the best articles published in the antitrust law and law & economics fields in the last 12 months.
Short-Listed Articles. «The Concurrences writing awards highlight outstanding work by practitioners in the area of competition law and policy and shed valuable light on "cutting edge" topics. The Antitrust Writing Awards' Board members will choose one article from among the finalists in each of 10 categories and will announce the winners at a gala awards ceremony on April 10, See the list of finalists in all categories.
«I greatly value seeing the list of articles nominated for a Concurrences award each year because it invariably brings to my attention some excellent pieces I would otherwise have missed.» Atilano Jorge Padilla «The Antitrust Writing Awards represent a unique initiative to reward pure and applied research in antitrust.
Academics and. The 8th edition of the Antitrust Writing Awards is organized by Concurrences Review and George Washington University Competition Law Center, with the support of Professor William Kovacic. The Antitrust Writing Awards' goal is to promote antitrust scholarship and competition advocacy by recognizing and awarding the best antitrust academic and.Concurrences writing awards list